JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 22, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Elizabeth Moreno Neira Vs. Empresa Social Del Estado Francisco De Paula Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Primero De Ejecucion De Penas Y Medidas De Seguridad De Cucuta Y El Juzgado Segundo De Menores De Bucaramanga. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Segundo De Menores De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Por factor funcional
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (21 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Juzgado 2º de Menores de Bucaramanga para que se adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial.
  2. MANUEL JOSÉ CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAUJO RENTERÍA
  5. Magistrado
  6. CON SALVAMENTO DE VOTO
  7. ALFREDO BELTRÁN SIERRA
  8. Magistrado
  9. JAIME CÓRDOBA TRIVIÑO
  10. Magistrado
  11. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  12. Magistrado
  13. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  14. Magistrado
  15. ÁLVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  16. Magistrado
  17. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  18. Magistrado
  19. CLARA INÉS VARGAS HERNÁNDEZ
  20. Magistrada
  21. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MÉNDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.